Coaches4 min read
Handling frustration in practice without losing the player
By Yoon Namkung · Tennis Coach & CEO, FiMH
A player misses the same backhand four times, hits the fence, and stops talking. You have twenty minutes of court time left and three other players waiting.
What you do in the next thirty seconds decides whether you get the session back — and whether the player still listens to you next week.
In the moment: reduce the load, not the standard
Frustration in a junior is almost always the gap between what they expect of themselves and what is happening. It is rarely about you, and it is rarely about the backhand.
The move that works is to lower the difficulty without lowering the standard:
- Change the task, not the topic. Same shot, easier feed, closer target. You are re-establishing success, not excusing the miss.
- Give a job, not a judgement. "Ten in a row cross-court, I'll count" gives the player something to do with the arousal. "Calm down" gives them one more thing to fail at.
- Say less. Coaching volume in the middle of frustration is not absorbed. Two sentences maximum until the player's shoulders drop.
- Never make it public. Correction in front of the group turns a bad five minutes into a status problem, and the player will defend the status before they work on the backhand.
What you are doing here is changing the situation so the emotion has somewhere to go. Regulating an emotion early — by adjusting the situation or where attention is pointed — is easier and costs less than trying to suppress it once it is fully running [3]. The player cannot think their way out of it in the moment, but they can hit ten cross-court.
Afterwards: the conversation that does the work
The real coaching happens ten minutes later, or the next day. Three things belong in it.
Name the pattern, not the character. "You go quiet when the backhand goes" is workable. "You have a bad attitude" is not, and the player will spend the conversation defending themselves instead of listening.
Ask what it felt like. You are looking for the trigger. Missing the shot, being watched by the group, the thought about next weekend's match — these need different answers, and only the player knows which one it was.
Agree on one signal. Something small and pre-arranged for next time: a word, a ball change, a walk to the towel. A player who has a plan for frustration is a player who is not surprised by it.
Why the relationship is the mechanism
It is tempting to treat this as discipline. The evidence points the other way: the quality of the coach–athlete relationship — closeness, commitment, and complementary behaviour between the two — is one of the strongest levers a coach has on how a young athlete performs and how long they stay in the sport [1].
A frustrated player is testing, mostly unconsciously, whether your approval depends on their forehand. Every session answers that question. The session where you answered it well is the session they remember when you ask them to do something hard.
The wider climate matters too. Coach-education programmes that move the emphasis from winning to effort and personal improvement are associated with lower performance anxiety in young athletes over a season [2] — which is to say the frustration you are managing on Tuesday is partly produced by the climate you set in September.
What not to do
- Don't match the energy. Raising your voice to meet theirs confirms that the moment is a crisis.
- Don't send them off court as a first move. Removal is a last resort; it teaches that the way out of a hard feeling is to leave.
- Don't relitigate it at the end of the session in front of the parent. That is a different conversation with a different audience, and the player has no way to win it.
- Don't ignore repeated, escalating distress. Persistent anxiety or distress beyond ordinary frustration is outside a coach's role. Talk to the parents and point them to a qualified professional.
The short version
In the moment: shrink the task, give a job, say less, keep it private. Afterwards: name the pattern, find the trigger, agree on a signal. The backhand is a coaching problem and you already know how to fix it. The thirty seconds after the racket hits the fence is the part worth planning.
References
- [1]Jowett, S. (2017). Coaching effectiveness: The coach–athlete relationship at its heart. Current Opinion in Psychology, 16, 154–158. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.copsyc.2017.05.006
- [2]Smith, R. E., Smoll, F. L., & Cumming, S. P. (2007). Effects of a motivational climate intervention for coaches on young athletes' sport performance anxiety. Journal of Sport and Exercise Psychology, 29(1), 39–59. https://doi.org/10.1123/jsep.29.1.39
- [3]Gross, J. J. (1998). The emerging field of emotion regulation: An integrative review. Review of General Psychology, 2(3), 271–299. https://doi.org/10.1037/1089-2680.2.3.271
About the author
Yoon Namkung · Tennis Coach & CEO, FiMH
Yoon Namkung is a tennis coach with GPTCA and ITF coaching qualifications and the CEO of FiMH. Yoon coached more than 200 junior and adult players at Jeongjinhwa Tennis Academy (JTA) in Seoul, and now works in Lyon, France, for tennis players, coaches, and parents.
All posts by Yoon NamkungThis article provides general information for educational purposes and is not medical or psychological advice.